That's cool. That one out of the two was the one I was really thinking of getting because it isn't too far in. Also, it seems they are going The Perhapanauts' past route with the mini idea. Which, as far as the series is going now, may return to that idea. Perhapanauts is still great, though.rwe1138 wrote:Firebreather is fantastic, but Phil said that Andy just couldn't handle it as a monthly, so future books will be a series of minis. But there is more coming, as well as the animated flick.
I get that. For all the main titles, their stuff was explained in their own books OYL within the first, if not a couple, stories of their titles. But, to me, those aren't flaws of 52, but of advertisement. It did, though, explain, in a sense, what the DCU was going through during that year.Joshua wrote:The most glaring was the fact that while 52 was initially conceived and advertised as explaining what took place in the year the continuity skipped over for OYL, it didn't actually explain anything in a year's time. All of the changes that occurred in OYL took place in the last two weeks of 52, rather than taking the course of a year to develop. Other problems it had were the fact that it introduced things without ever explaining them, like giant Hawkgirl. These things didn't keep me from enjoying the book. There were several plot threads that I took great pleasure in and it's the only weekly comic I've stuck with for the year's haul. Still, there's no denying that what 52 became is vastly different from what it started out to be.shining knight wrote:
What flaws were in 52? I didn't spot any
Also, giant Hawkgirl was explained. The Zeta Beam causes atomic anomalies if the beam is disrupted or malfunctions. That was what the whole fusion between Cyborg and Firestorm was about, Alan losing his eye, and some other things in that catastrophe.
I liked The Question, of course , but Booster's adventures were probably my favorite.shining knight wrote:
my fave strand of 52 (which no one will be shocked by) was the ralph Dibny story