Does anybody else think that it was weird for this book to have a Siege banner on it? This issue was pretty much business as usual.
Panels on Pages
comicgeekelly wrote:Does anybody else think that it was weird for this book to have a Siege banner on it? This issue was pretty much business as usual.
Its showing the events right before Siege from the New Avengers perspective, which we hadn't gotten yet. If you notice, the Spideys were seeing watching Avengers Tower mobilizing.LOOSECANNON wrote:comicgeekelly wrote:Does anybody else think that it was weird for this book to have a Siege banner on it? This issue was pretty much business as usual.
yeah, I think that little bit prevented me from giving it a 4...the business as usual needs to progress...otherwise nice ish..
Batman25JM wrote:New Avengers #63
Spidey was freakin' hilarious in this issue. I love the quote Bigtymin mentioned, as well as Spidey's stuff with Bullseye/Hawkeye:
(might not be exact)
Spidey: You know, I was just saying the other day that the only thing that could make you fake Avengers crazier would be if you all had goblin gliders.
Bullseye/Hawkeye: #$@$ you.
Spidey: AAAWWW that's so sweet.
There was another thing that Spidey said that cracked me up, but I can't remember right now what it was.
Yeah I've loved their dynamic all the way from Ellis's Thunderbolts run, kind of a bummer that it's ending. It should be interesting to see how Dr. Sofen ends up on Luke's T-bolts squad. She's a damn good manipulator so I could see her convincing them that she wants to change and all that. But the fates of Bullseye and Venom are question marks in all this, something tells me at least Venom will not be making it out alive...Aussiemandias wrote:I'm still struggling to see how Luke Cage is going to work with Moonstone on the Thunderbolts. She's got a lot to answer for. In fact the more I think of it, it's going to be a bit of a bummer not seeing Moonstone, Bullseye and Venom working together anymore (and Norman of course). But I guess it couldn't last forever considering who they are.
Jango Fett wrote:Quick question, did Steve McNiven or Frank Cho do the cover art for New Avengers #17?
(Here's a link to the cover: http://marvel.wikia.com/New_Avengers_17)
That site says that it's Cho, but it looks a lot like McNiven's art, and I thought the site might be wrong. Anyone know for sure?
Thanks!
Last edited by Batman25JM on Sat May 01, 2010 7:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
LOOSECANNON wrote:N.A. #63
As the last Siege tie-in before the "Finale" this was quite the let down,
Batman25JM wrote:New Avengers #64
Meh. It just feels like with all that's going on that Bendis isn't putting as much effort or focus into this book. It's like it's limping along waiting for the Heroic Age to begin. The issue wasn't horrible, but it wasn't that great either. I just can't wait for the Finale to be over so we can get to the Heroic Age.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|