http://panelsonpages.com/?p=10791
Panels on Pages
Since he has absolutely nothing to do with the business dealings of Marvel, I imagine he doesn't care one way or another.Babybear wrote:Am I the only one thinking that Stan Lee is probably throwing a BF at the news? Something tells me his spidey-sense just went ape-shit.
I've heard this from multiple people and I still don't get it. Disney owns many non-Disney entities and they have yet to scrub anything for cleanliness, so why do people suddenly think they're going to do anything to Marvel? There is zero precedent for such a maneuver.Yeah I really am kind of worried about this whole thing. granted I am not much a Marvel fan, I know it seems all they are talking more about like movie take overs and stuff. I am just nervous they will censor the comics to be more "Family Friendly" and personally my maturity level is way past that, and I like to read comics with a bit more edge to them
Joshua wrote:
What maturity level has to do with something being family friendly I don't really understand.
I think that's what I'm most interested in; the impact on theme parks it will have, if any.Rath99 wrote:
I wait to see how they handle the licensing side of Marvel. How will it affect Island of Adventure?
Joshua wrote:Disney owns many non-Disney entities and they have yet to scrub anything for cleanliness, so why do people suddenly think they're going to do anything to Marvel? There is zero precedent for such a maneuver.
Well, the burden of proof lies on the people to show which companies Disney has grossly interfered with, but I'll play along.blue halo wrote:Joshua wrote:Disney owns many non-Disney entities and they have yet to scrub anything for cleanliness, so why do people suddenly think they're going to do anything to Marvel? There is zero precedent for such a maneuver.
Care to give some examples?
krpykrwly wrote:http://comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=22747
UPDATE 8:30 AM PDT - There have been a number of developments since the initial press release about Disney’s acquisition of Marvel went out. Disney held a conference call with investors that just finished to discuss the deal and while much of it was focused on the financial aspect of the deal – with regards to both current and future opportunities – there were a number of comments concerning publishing and Marvel’s film slate that are of interest. The bullet points are:
Cable channel Disney XD is currently running about 20 hours a week of Marvel content and Disney has been looking to license more Marvel content and this deal gives them that opportunity as well as the opportunity to expose these characters internationally.<.li>
When asked if there was potential for cross-polination between Marvel and Pixar, Disney said that Pixar’s John Lasseter has met with key Marvel creative executives recently and the group got “pretty excited, very fast.” Disney will look at all opportunities and thinks there are some exciting product that could come from this sort of partnership.
The deal began when Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger reached out to Marvel Chief Executive Ike Perlmutter earlier this year. Again, Disney noted that they believe in the creative team at Marvel and see no reason to upset that applecart.
Foxy wrote:
What Marvel programming is Disney currently running?
Silent K wrote:According to my sources (my parents at dinner), Disney plans to continue taking checks from Universal for the licensing of the brand at Islands of Adventure, and Universal has no plans of changing things.
Joshua wrote:Holy crap! A few weeks ago at a con I had some buddies of mine do me a sketch. I requested Cyclops fighting a grizzly bear. They took the liberty of making the bear Winnie the Pooh. That's fucking prophetic.
I think that for the "possible team-ups" ideas people throw around, while I'm sick of them I understand most people do this just for fun. The joke was done when the first person said "Howard the Duck and Donald Duck", yet it's just nonsense people play with.Joshua wrote:
I've heard this from multiple people and I still don't get it. Disney owns many non-Disney entities and they have yet to scrub anything for cleanliness, so why do people suddenly think they're going to do anything to Marvel? There is zero precedent for such a maneuver.
What maturity level has to do with something being family friendly I don't really understand.
I know it's not as iconic as Winnie, but one of theJoshua wrote:Holy crap! A few weeks ago at a con I had some buddies of mine do me a sketch. I requested Cyclops fighting a grizzly bear. They took the liberty of making the bear Winnie the Pooh. That's fucking prophetic.
Foxy wrote:
What Marvel programming is Disney currently running?
Possible Pixar/Marvel makes me happy in the pants. A few posts ago Doug mentioned Power Pack, I think that would be a great team for a kids movie or cartoon.
I'm digging this news. I do think that Marvel characters are going to end up in a theme park though. Maybe not right away but I think that's a very good likelihood.
To be fair, when Dogma started getting death threats for being anti-Catholic Disney cut ties, which is why it was distributed by Lions Gate instead of Miramax.Spidey_82 wrote:I think Disney was involved in some ways in the past in ABC and Miramax decisions, yet we got graphic movies like Pulp Fiction and Dogma is one of the most controversial movies ever. If Disney could finance these, I believe they'll be okay with gay teens and gruesome vigilantes.
This is what I haven't understood. A lot of the of the more rabid fanboys are acting like Wal-mart bought some tiny mom & pop store, but Marvel is a huge corporation as well. This wasn't the case of a bully executing a hostile takeover. This was too very large businesses reaching a mutual agreement for the better of both.Besides, isn't Marvel an "evil" corporation too? This union seems only natural.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|