I went to see it this morning and wrote a quick 'n sloppy review.
The first Tron, while telling a story that was novel, was mostly notable because of the never-before-seen visuals and the mood-setting music. The plot often didn't make a lot of sense and many logical concessions had to be made on the part of the audience. Its sequel, while sleeker and faster, operates under the same MO. Its aesthetically pleasing (though not in the same "unlike anything we've ever seen" way of its predecessor) and the music (provided by Daft Punk) is phenomenal, but if put under too much scrutiny it's kind of idiotic. That said, it's a worthy successor in the Tron hierarchy and despite some shallow moments and bloated screenplay, it's still worth a look.
The script never elevates itself past the visuals, and while mostly functional, is more of a hindrance than anything. It feels the need to make references to the original, but doesn't trust its audience enough to be subtle or clever about it. For example, the main protagonist breaks into Encom much the same way Flynn did in the original and goes through the "big door". The audience will recognize the door fondly from the original, without any more help than a visual cue, but the writer felt it necessary to have its protagonist repeat the dialogue, "Now that's a big door." We know it's a big door, we know it's from the first movie, don't insult us by spoon-feeding us jokes. This same kind of emulation happens a couple more times in the first hair hour and while it is annoying, it doesn't persist once we're taken to the Grid and it becomes a minor annoyance. The movie deals with some of the same subtext as the original, but is far more superficial about it and mostly just comes across as a lot of meaningless technobabble. It's a shame too because a smarter script could have made a good movie a very good movie.
The visuals, while not particularly groundbreaking are still rather pleasing and my only complaint is the completely unnecessary and distracting 3D. Normally I wouldn't have watched it in 3D, but none of my local theaters had a standard showing. A shame too, because I spent much of the movie commiserating about how dim the picture looked, which certainly took away from the experience. The 3D effect itself adds nothing to the movie and isn't worth the dull picture and the annoying glasses. I look forward to the day when I can watch it at home on television without the hindrance of a gimmick that's overstayed its welcome. Outside of the 3D, I found the movie aesthetically pleasing, both in terms of visual effects and design. It evokes some of the same tone of the original, while properly making updates to the world of the Grid. The light cycle battle is a real treat (thanks also in part to the music) and is the first time in the movie when I started to settle in and enjoy myself. It's very well done and definitely the highlight of the movie. What I found more impressive than the environments was the digital de-aging used on Jefff Bridges. It was mostly convincing without looking like his face had been pushed through a computer.
The musical score is one of the better of the year, both in composition and mood. I'd say that anywhere from 40-50% of the movie's success from the soundtrack. It's inspiring and really enhances scenes, both in terms of action and drama.
It's not a great movie, but neither was the first Tron. It was a fun movie with some novel concepts and good visuals and music. Tron Legacy doesn't reinvent the wheel, but it provides enough bells and whistles to keep us interested for the duration of the ride, even if the ride probably should have been 20 minutes shorter. It's not going to be any kind of cinematic classic, but there are worse ways to spend a couple of hours. Recommended, provided you liked the original.
Last edited by Joshua on Sun Dec 19, 2010 6:47 pm; edited 2 times in total (Reason for editing : Fixed paragraphs.)