Scarlet Johansson in indeed Black Widow

I want to doooo her

Thundermatts wrote:
The Prestige is a plus on her resume to me

It was a great movie in spite of her, not because of her. She wasn't particularly bad in it, but she also didn't add anything.

Holy shit, that's awesome.

Thundermatts wrote:Not sure where all the ScarJo bad acting comes from. Not once have I seen her, you know, act badly.

I'm with ya, Matts. I don't think I've ever actively DISLIKED her. There are some roles where I maybe didn't love her, but I don't think there's been one where I truly had a problem with her.

I've seen The Prestige, In Good Company, and Girl with the Pearl Earring and thought she was fine to good in all three. Admittedly, she was pretty bad in The Island, but the movie was suckalicious anyhow. Perfect Score? Meh, she was alright. Again, it ain't Shakespeare. Oh, and I had NO problem with her in He's Just Not that into You.

is it mean to say flavour of the month?

^ Meh. She's lasted longer than the phrase is appropriate...so, I think we may have her for another half decade. At least.

Scottish people must have longer months over there. More time in a year = more inappropriate sheep toughing.

Hmm..I haven't read the article yet, but I'm willing to give them a chance. I mean let's face it, the movie will either blow our socks off or be shit. I'm thinking it's going to be great and this movie isn't Shakespeare, as someone pointed out about another movie. Plus, let's face it, we, as fans, will never be 100% happy with the choices studios make with our favorite characters.

^ Well, of course not, but it doesn't mean they should find it appropriate to shit out beloved concepts.

who has his hands on his junk and excited about this flick
This guy!

BlueMaxx wrote:BOOOOOOOOOOURNS!

Fixed.

Well, since they did a great job with casting last time, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. I have no problem with Johannsen, but I haven't seen much of her movies either.

My trust of Favreau/Downey far exceeds my distaste for Scarlett.

Ska wrote:

BlueMaxx wrote:BOOOOOOOOOOURNS!

Fixed.

Wait. Wasn't "boooourns" a fake compliment that Smithers tried to pawn off as the boos so Burns wouldn't think they didn't like him.

Yes. Yes it was.

Mnemosis wrote:Yes. Yes it was.

So...Ska is for Scarlett?

YUMMY

ajorton wrote:YUMMY

Welcome to PoP!, ajorton!

Debaser77 wrote:

ajorton wrote:YUMMY

Welcome to PoP!, ajorton!

Thanks man. Looks like a great place to be.

http://movies.yahoo.com/photos/collections/gallery/1922/2009-comiccon-photo-reveals#photo0

does anybody know if he is a hero or villain?

Not sure. One might think she's in with Fury, but Whiplash being Russian might suggest an alliance, there.

I think it'll be either partially like I suggested earlier, 1) a good spy turning out to be evil or 2) a villain (or former rough spy) joining the good guys.

Spidey_82 wrote:I think it'll be either partially like I suggested earlier, 1) a good spy turning out to be evil or 2) a villain (or former rough spy) joining the good guys.

so you don't know either

No. I just don't think she'll be simply good or evil, but someone who crosses the line.

Spidey_82 wrote:No. I just don't think she'll be simply good or evil, but someone who crosses the line.

i think they could do either like they did in the 616 universe or the ultimate universe version