Great interview with the Spidey "Brain Trust" of BND: Joe Kelly, Fred Van Lente, Dan Slott, and Mark Waid.
http://comics.ign.com/articles/110/1108430p1.html
http://comics.ign.com/articles/110/1108430p1.html
prescribeddrone wrote:Yeah, it's a dollar cheaper but just annoys me that they're raising the price, as comics get more expensive I'm going to be more selective to what I commit to by putting it in a pull list. I won't drop it right away, but maybe at some point if I have to cut down on books and the arcs aren't awing me that much.
TheBrownLantern wrote:prescribeddrone wrote:Yeah, it's a dollar cheaper but just annoys me that they're raising the price, as comics get more expensive I'm going to be more selective to what I commit to by putting it in a pull list. I won't drop it right away, but maybe at some point if I have to cut down on books and the arcs aren't awing me that much.
its true...if this is a marketing scheme by Marvel, i'm not sure how its going to pan out. I'm dropping titles from my pull list left and right these days. Time to be fickle
Bigtymin504 wrote:Amazing Spider-Man #639
This one was definitely better than the last, and I have to say the way they handled the marriage issue was fairly simple yet very effective. I liked it. There are still a few issues they have to explain but so far things seem to be on the right track. The bigger question is, why didn't Quesada just tell this story right after OMD. It would have gone a long way to calm some of the outrage at the time. The only explanation seems like they wanted the fanboy outrage and the massive attention that goes with it...the whole "any publicity is good publicity" saying.
Batman25JM wrote:^I haven't read everything since OMD. I dropped the book around issue #610 or so, and thus I can't speak of stuff since, but I did not like what they were doing with the book at all. It was silly and boring. The only post OMD arc I enjoyed was American Son. Irregardless of quality, was there really a single story told that couldn't have been done with a married Peter? I'm talking about big plots, not the small stuff like dating or sleeping with what's her name.
Batman25JM wrote:^I just don't see it that way. Going off the stuff I read, Peter still could have faced Freak, and Mr. Negative, and all those other new villains in the same way. Sure, the personal stuff would have been different, but the same general stories could have been told. I mean, Normal could have still tried to make Harry American Son, etc. Peter being single did not add to that story.
Batman25JM wrote:^To each their own. I disagree though. The marriage did effect things, but at the core of the villain threats, his marital status really didn't matter.
Batman25JM wrote:^It's just from what I read they never really dealt too thoroughly with the single life. It was touched upon, but there weren't any huge story arcs that explored Peter's romantic life.
I still feel the retcon was unnecessary and I do not like it one bit.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|